*Tobacco and Health - Feature article

May 31 st is observed as World No Tobacco day by the World Health organisation. While the west the consumption of tobacco products are coming down there is an alarming increase in the consumption in developing countries and particularly in India. In this feature we try to focus our attention on Tobacco, its impact, the World No Tobacco day celebrations at Geneva, Mumbai Municipal corporations initiative, the problems envisaged in enforcing the advertisement code on Tobacco in India and other matters.

Dot.gif (144 bytes)Why Focus on Tobacco?

Dot.gif (144 bytes)Economics of Tobacco

Dot.gif (144 bytes)Effective policies and interventions make a difference

Dot.gif (144 bytes)World No-Tobacco Day Events in Geneva

Dot.gif (144 bytes)The Indian advertising regulations

 

 

B_back.jpg (4011 bytes)

Why Focus on Tobacco?

The extremely negative impact of tobacco on health now and in the future is the primary reason for giving explicit and strong support to tobacco control on a worldwide basis. The increased impact of tobacco looms as one of the greatest public health threats in the 21st century. WHO estimates that there are currently 4 million deaths a year
attributable to tobacco, a figure expected to rise to about 10 million by 2030. By that date 70% of those deaths will
occur in developing countries. Mortality data do not reflect the enormous additional toll caused by tobacco that is felt in terms of morbidity, disability and suffering among children and adults.

There are currently over a billion smokers in the world. The largest single number is in Asia. The proportion of women that smoke is comparatively higher in Europe and North America than in other parts of the world. However, recent estimates suggest growing numbers of smokers in developing countries, particularly amongst women.

Recent trends indicate that the smoking prevalence rate in adolescent boys and girls is rising in many countries where previously tobacco control had been considered successful. Thus, while new markets are being opened by industry actions, old markets have not been closed - tobacco is a global threat.

 

B_back.jpg (4011 bytes)

Economics of Tobacco

The economic impact of tobacco has been analysed in many countries in recent years. Studies in countries as diverse as Thailand, South Africa, Switzerland, China and Brazil are now available to complement some of the previous studies done in the United Kingdom, USA and Canada. Together, these studies show that the alleged economic benefits of tobacco are illusory. There are, however, large direct, indirect and intangible costs associated with tobacco that hamper economic development rather than promote it. Tobacco harms the environment

In many of the tobacco growing countries evidence indicates negative environmental impacts of tobacco agriculture, particularly when associated with deforestation required to increase farmland and cure tobacco plants.

 

 

B_back.jpg (4011 bytes)

Effective policies and interventions make a difference

Effective policies and interventions make a real difference to tobacco prevalence and consumption, and associated health outcomes. Most of the documented successes have occurred in developed countries where effective approaches have been implemented for several years. In more recent years, several developing countries have introduced similar measures. Early indications are that they too will be effective.

The Finish experience is particularly important since it stresses the need to consider success in periods of decades rather than years. The combined impact of legislation, increased tax and comprehensive community-based strategies on tobacco consumption in adults in Finland has led to significant reduction in tobacco use. Further, it should be noted that when Finland began addressing tobacco, it was then not the wealthy country it is today. This has implications for other countries wishing to consider the Finnish model as one way to move ahead.

One major study has analysed the individual and combined effects of a range of policies and interventions on futureprevalence (Townsend 1998). Price increases (through excise taxes on tobacco products) constitute by far the most important policy tool available. The other interventions have demonstrated effectiveness when properly enacted and enforced (advertising bans, treatment of tobacco dependence, smoking restrictions, and health education). The UK study highlights the need for policy makers to use the best mix of policies that will be supported within a particular country at a particular time.

Success stories indicate the importance of considering the best mix of specific interventions required to achieve the same goal: increased cessation and lowered initiation. The elements of the WHO comprehensive policy supported by Member States are summarised in Table 1. The specific mix of interventions in a broad policy framework will vary according to each country's political, social, cultural and economic reality. Public support, mediated through the media and the legislative process, are crucial determinants of success.

Human, institutional and financial resources for all aspects of tobacco control at country, regional and global levelsare severely inadequate. Faced with a US$400 billion industry, global spending on tobacco control has not addressed most countries' need for even a modicum of human and institutional capacity. Tobacco control is often tagged onto other functions. Financial support for international research, policy development and action to address the impact of tobacco has been restricted to a few modest initiatives.

 


B_back.jpg (4011 bytes)

World No-Tobacco Day Events in Geneva

ON 31st May at the WHO headaquarters in Geneva the world's largest chocolate ashtray will be displayed. The DG of WHO will then recieve the model of the same after listening to public reactions.

Mumbay Municipal corporation declares anti-gutkha week

from May 31

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) will observe `anti-ghutka' and `anti-tobbaco' week from May 31 to June four. Deputy Mayor Ram Barot said that the World Health Organisation (WHO) will be observing Anti-Tobbaco Day on May 31st where paan shops and other stalls selling ghutka will be pursuaded not to sell ghutka which is injurious to health.

During the week, BMC will organise discussions seminars, medical tests, display posters and banners in greater Mumbai. About 5000 volunteers would take part in the campaign to pursuade the common man to stop using the tobacco, he added.

B_back.jpg (4011 bytes)

 

 

The Indian advertising regulations

MUMBAI: Even as the US has decided to ban outdoor advertising of tobacco products and in the UK live models are barred in tobacco ads, there is no enforceable code to regulate tobacco advertising in India.

The only self-regulatory advertising code that could have ``morally bound'' the tobacco lobby was the one formulated by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), which was prematurely struck down after the tobacco industry decided it could not adhere to many of its diktats.

So now we have a code on advertising that has been formulated by the Tobacco Institute of India (a body of
tobacco majors). Although it took shape in 1995 and underwent a revamp last year, it is yet to get the proposed
ombudsman ``comprising officials of TII, industry and eminent people'' to oversee the implementation of the code.
The TII has still to rope in the industry and the rules of procedure are yet to be finalised, since they have to be
done in consultation with the ombudsman.

The ASCI code, incidentally, broke down because of two key issues--celebrity endorsements and surrogate advertising (like the Red and White Bravery Awards or the Four Square and Wills Cricket Gear ads).

Both these issues are linked to the same issue--that of targeting youngsters, say ASCI officials. Explains Sam
Balsara, managing director of Madison DMB&B and one of the members who drafted the ASCI tobacco code, What we were worried about was that ads which use movie stars and other celebrities have a direct bearing on the minds of the youth, and ASCI strictly forbids this''.

The glamour and aspirational element is also harmful,'' says Swarn Kohli, chairperson, Consumer Education and
Research Centre and an ASCI member. ``The glamour element associated with cigarette smoking is definitely pernicious. The swanky houses, lavish cars and rich lifestyles portrayed even in brands which are not targeted at the upper class is disturbing. But the main concern is that these ads portray (to youngsters) that smoking is the `in thing'. The small illegible health warning on the packs too needs to be reviewed and made bigger. Youngsters near colleges and schools also should not be targeted.''

However, TII spokesperson Amit Sarkar feels otherwise. ``A survey has shown that advertising does not initiate tobacco consumption and it is other factors like peer pressure, for instance, that induces the youth to take to smoking,'' he reasons. When questioned on why companies like ITC then spend crores of rupees on advertising if ads don't induce consumption, Mr Sarkar says: "That is for building a trademark. There is nothing wrong if companies use their trademarks, which are perceived to be of high value by consumers, and diversify into new product categories.''

Wills, for instance, has extended its brand name to cricket gear.

But that's fine'' says Mr Balsara. ``No one is stopping you from making bats, but then don't show Sachin Tendulkar carrying a Wills bat. Tendulkar is a hero to millions of little children and youngsters.'' The ASCI code, explains Balsara, required that if the name of a tobacco brand was to be used for any other product category, it was only fair that the same restrictions imposed on the tobacco brand be applicable to that category as well. ``If not, then the whole exercise becomes redundant'' he adds.

The second issue -- that of surrogate advertising -- had also got ASCI and the tobacco lobby in a non-negotiable
mood. The Red and White Bravery Award instituted by Godfrey Philips is one such example. Says Gautam Rakshit, managing director, Avenues Advertising:``Role models portray the ideal behaviour patterns for the youth of today. The Red and White Bravery Award is attempting to create role models for the young and the association of a role model with a brand of cigarettes is by implication stating that role models endorse cigarette smoking. This has a negative influence on young people.''

Leave alone the ASCI code, even the TII code does not seem to have been adhered to by many of the members themselves . For example a provision states that ads shall not include any direct personal testimonial (written or spoken) urging or recommending the use of a tobacco product by a person of distinction in any walk of life in a manner which is particularly attractive to minors. However, The Akshay Kumar ads for Godfrey Philips' Red and White cigarettes all over the city are a mute testimony to the fact that the code is being violated. Incidentally, the managing director of Godfrey Philips, Ram Poddar, is the president of the Tobacco Institute of India. Repeated messages to his public relations agency, Clea, to get Mr Poddar to respond did not elicit any response.

Mr Sarkar, however, takes cover under a small technicality in the code which says that if the personality was signed on before he attained celebrity status, then that ad can continue. ``From what I know,'' he says ``Akshay Kumar was signed on much earlier and in any case he is not as big a star as Shah Rukh,'' he counters.

Another provision prohibits tobacco ads through any media primarily meant for schools, hospitals and places of
worship, or on the compound walls of these institutions. However, the most blatant violation of this clause is seen
within the premises of the Mahalaxmi temple at Haji Ali in Mumbai. Inside the compound wall of the main temple (at the coveted junction of Peddar Road and Bhulabhai Desai Road is a huge hoarding of Indian Tobacco's Company's (ITC) Wills Sport ad (cheering India for the World Cup). Just some weeks back a Gold Flake hoarding towered over commuters. A few yards away, near a smaller temple, a Four Square Cigarette signage illuminates another paan shop. The entrance near the Haji Ali Dargah too has similar shop signs of Will's Filter Kings. Adds Mr Rakshit: ``

If there is a violation, then even at the cost of commercial loss it should not be used if the tobacco lobby is serious about implementing the code.'' On direct marketing, the code says: ``No known non-smoker or non-user of tobacco products will be sampled or contacted.'' The catch in this sentence is the word `known' Says Amol Bose of Amol Bose Advertising and past president of the Advertising Association of India: ``It iswell-nigh impossible to ask every individual whether he is above 18 or not, and there have been instances where youngsters have been asked to distribute cigarette samples near cinema halls.'' According to Ms Viji Venkatesh of the Cancer Patients' Aid Association, ``A leading brand of cigarettes from ITC was freely sampled to all and sundry near Shivaji
Park and at various discotheques.''

While the tobacco code stipulates that minors (those below 18 years) should not be targeted, Mr Rakshit says this whole business of minors is wrong. Its youngsters, period, who should not be targeted. A person could be 20 years old and yet be a potential target. Students who just enter college are clearly below the age of eighteen (assuming they haven't repeated any class.''

The code is vague on other issues too. It states that exhibition of any tobacco product should not be undertaken in a children's film or a TV show meant for children. But on the other hand, it says: ``It is clarified that the mere
granting of a U certificate does not make the film a children's film.'' But then there is no special certification for children's films. Unless there is a clear-cut way to define a children's film, it won't be easy to interpret the clause. The code has to be more explicit in its definition of what constitutes a children's film, say industry officials.

Is the government really serious about regulating advertisements for the benefit of the consuming public? One
wonders, especially with many traffic booths being sponsored by tobacco companies. Moreover, it is time to define what constitutes an advertisement. According to a high court judgement, a logo in itself does not constitute an
advertisement, and so we see the Indian cricket team sporting the Wills logo. But the anti-tobacco insists that a
logo is an advertisement. If that weren't the case, one fails to understand why ITC spends crores of rupees to get
sportsmen to don its Wills logo.

It's high time these issues were discussed in open forums, and more importantly, aptly represented by all sections of society, to arrive at a consensus.