
Subbiah Arunachalam (Arun) is an information consultant
based in Madras (now renamed Chennai) in South India. He has
been associated with Indian academic and scholarly
communities for over three decades. He has been editor of
scientific journals [Indian Journal of Technology, Journal
of Scientific & Industrial Research, Indian Journal of
Chemistry, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences,
and PramanaJournal of Physics], a science writer, a
chemistry researcher, an information science instructor, a
librarian in a national laboratory, the executive secretary
of the Indian Academy of Sciences, and an editorial board
member of scientific journals. Currently he is a
Distinguished Fellow in the M.S. Saminathan Research
Foundation and a part-time Visiting Professor at the Indian
Institute of Technology, Chennai. His research interests
include science on the periphery, scientometrics, and
information access. He has recently completed a literature-
based study on mapping science in India. He has more than 40
papers to his credit and is on the editorial boards of six
refereed international journals. He has delivered more than
20 invited talks at international conferences. His forte is
his knowledge and understanding of the Indian scientific and
scholarly community and their work. He is a member of both
the Indian and the International Science Writers
Associations.
He can be reached at :
ComCom : Sir, after working as a devoted hardcore research scientist at
CECRI, Karaikudi, you had migrated to science publication and later to
science popularization. In fact this trend can be equated to "lab to
land". We wish that you would elaborate on this migratory mechanism
which will of course be an eye-opener to other practising scientists.
Prof. Arun : Let me begin with a disclaimer! I was not much of a scientist, let
alone a hardcore researcher. True I started my career at CECRI trying
to develop a cost-effective and efficient method of producing zari
threads used in the famous silk saris of South India under the guidance
of an unpretentious elderly man.
Within two years, I left for New Delhi
to join the editorial team of the Publications & Information
Directorate of CSIR, where I had the privilege of working with one of
Indias outstanding technical editors, Mr A Krishnamurti. I realised
then that writing and editing came to me naturally, but others had not
seemed to notice it! While in Delhi, I shared an apartment with some
very committed and competent individuals, each one of whom went on to
make a mark in his chosen field. In their company, I imbibed a lot.
After four years at PID, I went to IISc, Bangalore, to pursue
laboratory research. There was a sharp fall in my income and I started
writing science stories for newspapers! It was then I met Prof. S
Ramaseshan, who was quick to spot the extra-scientific talents in me,
and he persuaded me to join the Indian Academy of Sciences in Bangalore
and we worked together on many projects, which transformed the Academy.
I played a key role in the founding of Pramana, the Academys physics
journal, and in getting a large number of competent Indian scientists
elected to the Fellowship of the Academy. At the Academy I was
virtually a one-man army doing many things, quietly from the
background of course, but enjoying every bit of it.
I was watching from
close quarters scientists and science policy in the making. Mr Surendr
Jha came to know about me and started asking me to write for Science
Today. I took my time. My first piece on the status of science in
India appeared in Science Today after I returned to New Delhi in 1975.
That and two other articles, which appeared in quick succession,
attracted much attention. Despite the tremendous differences in our
lifestyles, Suren, a Bohemian, and I, an ascetic, became close friends.
I was amazed at the deep commitment to science and science
communication hidden behind his happy-go-lucky appearance. I decided to
help him without expecting any returns. As it turned out, I was not cut
out to make good at laboratory research.
My inclinations took me into
information science and scientometrics. Even when I was a student at
IISc I helped many students with their information needs and writing.
Gene Garfield gave me a big break, when he took me on the editorial
board of Current Contents in 1977. This was followed by invitations
from half a dozen journals, including Journal of Information Science,
Scientometrics and Current Science and invitations to speak at many
international conferences in Europe and North America. I got more and
more involved in looking at the scientific enterprise deeply and
writing about it. Actually, I do not write often. Call me lazy! Indeed
I am not excited about reporting late international developments as a
second-hand narrator. That, I think, is the job of reporters and
correspondents employed by news agencies and newspapers. I enjoy
writing well-researched articles on the state of science and its
various aspects such as information needs of Indian scientists and
how they could be satisfied.
Also, I devote much time in helping
others. For instance, I put in much effort to establish the Science
Writers Association, and to organize two workshops for science writers,
one of them with the help of the Indian Institute of Science at
Bangalore. I went to England at my expense to persuade two of the most
outstanding science communicators to come to India to run the
workshops. I have also helped many young writers in the formative years
of their careers and some of them do remember. Some may not, but that
doesnt bother me a bit. After Suren left Science Today, I helped the
new editor of the magazine get to know people who mattered in Delhi.
To be honest, I was not really a scientist in the true sense of the
word. But my association with CECRI, IISc and the Indian Academy of
Sciences and the professional contacts with countless number of
authors, referees and conference participants helped me a great deal in
my evolution as a science writer and critic.
ComCom: We would like to know more details of the M.S. Swaminathan Research
Foundation and your role in its activities. We also hear that the
Foundation is trying to popularise Internet among the slum children and
Pondicherry. Your answer will give us first hand version of the success
story.
Prof. Arun : MSSRF is an organization founded by a visionary with his own money. It
is committed to a mission of harnessing science and technology for
environmentally sustainable and socially equitable development. MSSRF's
research, training, communication, extension and networking programmes,
in the fields of agriculture and rural development, seek to link
ecological security to livelihood security in a mutually reinforcing
manner. It is about ten years old and we have about 200 people on our
staff.
About three years ago, the Foundation was chosen for the Blue
Planet Award, the first Asian institution to have won this award. You
can learn about our work, accomplishments and our philosophy by
visiting our website
We have
a modern informatics centre and use geographic information systems
(GIS) extensively. We hold several symposia and consultations every
year on issues of great immediate relevance and these meetings attract
some of the worlds leading experts and thinkers. Among those who have
attended such meetings in recent times are Prof. Bruce Alberts,
President of the US National Academy of Sciences, Dr Ismail Serageldin,
Senior Vice President of the World Bank, Dr Jacques Diouf, Director
General of FAO, and Dr Norman Myers, the eminent writer.
We are not teaching Internet to slum children. What the Foundation has
been doing in the past two years is to use information to empower
people in a cluster of villages near Pondicherry. The idea is simple
and elegant like all great ideas. If people can obtain information
that they badly need and can use immediately, then such information can
make a difference in their lives. So an MSSRF team, led by a dynamic
young man called V Balaji, surveyed the villages to list the different
kinds of information needed by the local people and their access to
information and information technology.
The team designed a hybrid
wired and wireless system that can be used to transmit both voice and
data. They engaged volunteers to collect information ranging from
meteorological to commodity prices and government schemes. They trained
the local people to operate personal computers, key in data in Tamil,
use telephones and wireless systems and to send and receive email and
fax messages. Through a participatory approach, they convinced the
villagers to provide a common room in each village in someones
house, in a temple, or in a public building to maintain the computers
and the communication equipment, and pay for the volunteers.
The MSSRF
experts provided training to the village volunteers and help in the
maintenance of the equipment. Each centre has solar energy backup so
even when the power fails they can remain connected. What is most
striking about the whole project is the prime place given to people and
the information they need; technology is only secondary, as it should
be. And many of the people involved in the project are just ordinary
in terms of training and educational background, but extraordinary in
terms of the social transformation they are bringing about. That is one
aspect of Swaminathans way of doing things: giving opportunities to
ordinary people to achieve extraordinary results.
As it would be impossible for us in India to provide telephones and
computers to individual homes, the only way we could take advantage of
the awesome power of information and communication technologies is to
adopt the community access model. Now these community information
centres have become very popular. Not only are the farmers getting the
market price of their produce, but also they were able to know the
school finals examination results of their wards within minutes of
announcement in far off Chennai.
My own role at the Foundation is limited. I continue to do my
scientometric analysis of science in India, although that is not a key
area of interest of the Foundation. I assist the Informatics group and
others whenever called upon to do so. Occasionally, I write about the
Foundation and its work for the media. Recently, I spoke about the
Information Village project at a debate organised by the Volkswagen
Foundation in Hanover and at the University of Brighton. I also spoke
about it in an interview by the Overseas Service of the BBC (Radio).
ComCom: We also would like to know something about the present NISCOM's
problems since we know that you had a stint in the erstwhile PID. How
to revive the institute? Please tell if it is not embarrassing to you.
We are interested in only in its revival plans and suggestions.
Prof. Arun : I know that NISCOM has been going through an unhappy phase. I had seen
the best of times. When I joined PID, the seniormost editor was holding
the rank of Scientist C. None of them who followed him that includes
me and the late Mr P S Shankar were of the same class. But the
organization expanded, salary and status of the staff improved, and yet
there was rising discontent, especially in the past ten years or so.
Coming to the present, I dont see any administrative problem. CSIR
should appoint a competent director and let him/her handle the affairs
of the institute according to the statutes. A revival plan may include
refresher courses for the editorial staff not only in writing and
editing skills but also in new technologies. The world over, journals
are going electronic. To be able to produce electronic journals, NISCOM
staff should be competent in JAVA, HTML, XML, etc. Right now, many
editors cannot even be reached easily by email.
Incidentally,
electronic versions of two life science journals of NISCOM are already
being brought out by an agency in the UK. CSIR may examine the Indian
Academys journal publishing model and adapt practices that can improve
NISCOMs performance and bring down the overall costs. I see
considerable improvement in recent years in the editorial and
production qualities of Indian magazines. I see no reason why technical
journals and other publications of CSIR should not improve. Another
suggestion I would make is to bring in a creativity consultant to raise
motivation levels of the staff and make them work as a team.
ComCom:Can you recollect your one good field experience, which reflects
the success or other wise of scientific awareness?
Prof. Arun : In the Information Village experiment of MSSRF, most volunteers are
women and I am amazed at the speed with which they have learnt to
operate sophisticated high-tech equipment and their self-confidence.
I am attaching a scanned image of a picture.
A few years ago, NCSTC asked me to go to Shillong to conduct a five-day
workshop on science communication to the youth of the Northeastern
states. When the workshop began, hardly anyone was willing to speak.
But by day two, I couldnt go to bed before it was well past midnight
some of the participants would come to the guesthouse for discussion!
ComCom:Sir, What is your comment on the status of science communication in INDIA?
Prof. Arun : Science communication is reaching by and large only the already
reached. There are science columns in The Hindu, The New Indian
Express, The Telegraph, Pioneer, etc. No doubt that each column talks
about something new and probably something useful. But are we reaching
new audience is the question. Then there are children's science
magazines such as Tulir in Tamil. These are the ones to be encouraged.
Indeed, we should persuade philanthropic foundations to support free
distribution of such magazines to all the schools in the country. I
have also seen at book fairs and at exhibitions at Science Congress
venues popular science books of the University Press (many of the
titles by Dr G Venkataraman) and NISCOM selling well among students
going to certain kinds of schools and their parents. TV channels such
as Discovery and National Geographic are making some useful
contribution. Voluntary organizations such as KSSP and Ekalavya and
government agencies such as NCSTC are making an honest effort to reach
the people. But the country is vast and the population very large. We
need to do very much more.
ComCom:Why science related magazines do not become popular among young
children and students in India?
Prof. Arun : There are two reasons. Many of these are produced so badly and one is
not sure about the accuracy. Secondly, these have to compete with other
interests for students pocket money other magazines, films, eating
out, entertaining friends and so on. Even so, if the students and their
parents feel that these magazines satisfy a genuine need then they will
not hesitate to subscribe to them.
ComCom: What really can be done by Indian media, visual as well as print
media, to achieve desired level of science communication?
Prof. Arun : The answer is simple. Like the don in Mario Puzos novel Godfather
said, they should offer something the readers and viewers cannot
refuse! I am sorry for those who cannot read Tamil; there is a writer
called Sujatha Rangarajan who can make anything interesting. He would
relate the concept he is trying to explain to common experiences of his
readers. And he does it in style. Most so-called science writers write
so poorly that students would find their textbooks far more
interesting.
My friend Gene Garfield is another good role model for
science journalists who want to write well-researched articles. All his
essays hundreds of them are now available on the Web. Recently, two
television production companies in the UK called me repeatedly to plan
shooting in India. They were planning to shoot films on subjects
ranging from future farming to extremes of climate and were looking
for the right people to be interviewed and the right locations and
suitable time of the year. They dont mind spending a lot of money and
more importantly do a lot of homework to establish the right contacts.
No wonder they are able to sell their productions to Discovery or
National Geographic. There must be this desire to excel at all costs
and keenness to achieve the highest professional standards.
ComCom: In your opinion can INTERNET online magazines have a role to play
in science communication in India?
Prof. Arun : Yes. At the moment its reach may be poor, as there are not many people
in India having access to Internet. But Internet access is expanding as
well as becoming more affordable. There are many science news sites
such as Eurekalert, Gene, and ScienceNow, which are popular. Apart from
running its own science news Webzine, NCSTC may persuade other Indian
outfits such as Rediff on the Net, Indialine and Khoj to pay greater
attention to reporting science and technology.
ComCom:What can be done by NGOs and connected GOs to improve the status?
Prof. Arun : NGOs at least some of them are doing well in taking science to the
people. Tulir is run by an NGO based at Chennai. KSSP in Kerala goes
beyond publishing. Many NGOs take active part in the annual Science
Jatha supported by NCSTC. In Karnataka, the Vigyan Parishad is known
for its commitment. The Assam Science Society has some committed and
knowledgeable individuals.
ComCom:Your advice to young science writers of India...
Prof. Arun : Nothing comes easily. Prepare yourself. Read widely, not only good
science writing but also about the art of writing. Meet working
scientists and talk to them about their work and their specialties.
Watch good science programmes on the TV and listen to quality
programmes such as those produced by Martin Redfern of BBC. Do some
research before you start writing go to a good library, use the
Internet, meet experts, ... the possibilities are endless!
ComCom : Thank you very much Professor.
NASA Science Communications Strategy
E-Mail - Prof. Arunachalam
Subbiah Arunachalam,
28 Luz Avenue,
Mylapore,
Chennai 600 004, India.
Fax: 91-44-2351319.


SCIENCE COMMUNICATION LINKS
HANDS ON SCIENCE OUTREACH
STAS - Science Awareness site
Canadian Science Writers' Association
National Science & Technology Week - USA
Environmental Database for use in Schools
The Extreme science